Biomimetic Robots
ABSTRACT
A lot of
conventional thinking is prevalent in the field of robotics as a whole and this
is an attempt to present a brief idea of things being done by researchers
throughout the world in the field of biomimetic robots. Biomimetic or
bioinspired robots is a broad term that applies to those robots whose design
has been created or copied from the biological data of various organisms. It is
an attempt by the researchers world-wide to understand how birds fly, how dolphins
swim in water, how humans walk and apply those activities in a device which can
lead to better technologies for the society in general. A brief introduction into the various
research projects around the world has been given. Research groups have hopes
of developing robots that might possibly detect mines, explore Mars through
BEES (Bioinspired engineering of exploration systems), or even search for
trapped people in disaster situation.
1.INTRODUCTION
What is
biomimetic? Biomimetic is a general description for engineering a process or
system that mimics biology. The term has emerged from the field of biochemistry
and applies to an infinite range of chemical and mechanical phenomenon, from
cellular processes to whole-organism functions. The field itself is relatively
new and collaborations required between biologists, robotics engineers and
computer science engineers have barely begun.
Mark Cutkosky, a professor in Stanford
University’s Department of Mechanical Engineering defines it as “ extracting
principles from the field of biology and then applying it to man-made devices –
particularly robots.” Talking of the programming being done by the various
research groups, Butler Hine, manager of the Computing information and
communications technology program based at NASA- Ames, believes that
“biomimetics uses nature’s evolved way of doing things rather than the
computationally intensive way”.
Biomimetics in a broad sense is a
convergence of various fields of science as a whole and provides a chance for
looking into the living systems for inspiration for creation of new robots. It
requires the expertise of a team of investigators from diverse backgrounds to
understand the various complex processes involved. For example, the movements
made by animals or legged robots are generated by actions within a control
system ultimately causing a mechanical system to act upon objects. In animals,
control is found in the nervous system and the muscles and skeleton make up the
mechanical part.
Four view points are to be considered
over here to get the exact output.
-
First is a biological viewpoint wherein biologists understand at a
neurobiological and behavioral level how animals move through their
environment.
-
Second, are those engineers who develop the control architectures
through computer modeling.
-
Third, biomedical engineers who develop prospective neural network
devices that would interface with the mechanical systems to regulate movements.
-
Fourth is a mechanical engineering perspective that seeks to
construct artificial systems that move through complex terrain and manipulate
objects in assembly.
The diversity found in the goals and backgrounds of each of the
four individual groups combines to permit an investigation of biomechanical
system. A common goal here would be to understand how movement results from an
intimate interaction between control systems that direct movement and
mechanical systems that execute it.
Various research groups around the world are working on various
different projects out of which a brief overview of some I found really
interesting is presented here. Projects varying from land, water and air have
been discussed.
2.UNDERWATER ROBOTICS
Fig. 1 Joseph Ayers,
along with his team at NorthEastern University are carrying out research on the
field on robotic lobsters. Particularly, they are testing the locomotion
characteristics
Two research groups, one based in Brooklyn College and headed by
Frank Grasso and another based in Northeastern University and headed by Joseph
Ayers, have been working on different aspects of the lobsters. The first is
working on sensory-chemical tracking and lobster’s acute sense of smell to
sense prey in all circumstances while the latter team is working on locomotion
systems that would probably be the first robot with an elementary nervous
system. The robots would be using neuronal circuit
based controllers, artificial muscle based on smart materials and
microelectronic sensors that code in the same fashion as animal sensors.
Frank Grasso, associate professor of
psychology at Brroklyn College[9][8], is working on lobster’s ability to sense
its prey in turbulent ocean conditions. Work on Robolobsters I and II has been
completed and they match the size as well as the sensing and locomotive
abilities of their biological counterparts. These robots let the researchers
test the hypotheses based on the lobster’s ability to detect olfactory
information and make decisions based on it. As working of these robots is
primarily under water, it is not possible to have it attached to power source.
Joseph Ayers, a biology professor at
Northeastern University[8][6], is working on the locomotion system of the
lobsters. Typically in the field of robotics, motors are used to achieve
locomotion but he is trying to use neurons to analog VLSI that would be
subsequently used to generate “motor program-like central pattern generators
based on neurons”. The whole working has been divided into two components: the
central system and the peripheral system. Central system consists of the following major components:
- Segmental central pattern generators (CPGs)
that control the
motor neurons and ultimately the muscles of each limb.
- Coordinating systems that determine the phase
relations or gaits between the CPGs of different limbs.
- Command
Systems that specify and modulate the behavior generated by the CPGs. The
command systems represent the control locus at which the decision to generate a
particular behavior is achieved.
In addition to this, peripheral systems
are designed consisting of sensors that provide feedback to the central pattern
generators.
- Exteroceptive or Orientational Reflexes
that operate at the level of the command systems to generate whole-body
compensatory responses.
- Phase Modulating Reflexes that
operate at the CPG level to reset the timing of oscillations during stumbles,
etc.
- Amplitude
Modulating Reflexes that operate at the motor neuron level to control the
amplitude of the motor output.
One of the major problems faced by the research group is that of
an actuator that approximates muscle. Crustacean muscle joints has mechanical
properties that are quite different from typical robotic actuators and these
properties need to modeled to achieve interface between controlling neuronal
signals and realization of joint angular movements. This is a very difficult
problem considering the fact that crustacean muscle is typically modeled as a tension generating
component (the contractile fibers) in series with an elastic component
(tendons), both of which are in parallel with an elastic component (muscle cell
membranes). Neuromuscular control, on the other hand, is mediated by motor
neurons that differ in the number of muscle fibers that they recruit.
DARPA, ONR and NSF are primarily funding both the researches.
However, the lack of a single goal to find an appropriate use of the technology
is the only hindrance in achieving the required results. Joel L. Davis, an ONR
professor working on adaptive neural systems expects that one robotic lobster
should be ready for use by summer 2006.
These
robots can fulfill a variety of missions including remote sensing, ship
tagging, and mine countermeasures. Deep underwater surveillance can also be
carried out using these devices. A military application as discussed would be
to search for mines on beachheads and they can be further designed to work
underwater or on the surface of land in shallow beach areas. If one lobster
detects a mine, for example, it should signal others in the area to go away
before it detonates it. These applications are at a very preliminary stage and
require lot of planning before reaching the implementation level.
3.BIOMIMETICS IN THE
AIR
The Biorobotics Research Group[1]at Movement and Perception Lab,
France have been working on biologically inspired aerial vehicles for quite
some time and have been successful enough to develop systems that can be
mounted on-board Micro-Air-Vehicles. They have developed two Automatic Flight
Control Systems (AFCS): OCTAVE (Optical altitude Control system for Autonomous
Vehicles) and OSCAR (Optical Scanning sensor for Autonomous Robots).
The whole system is primarily based on EMD (Elementary Motion
Detectors), which forms the visual processing system of the OCTAVE and OSCAR.
The system consists of two photoreceptors Ph1 and Ph2, the visual axes of which
are separated by an interreceptor angle. The scheme of EMD looks as follows:
1. Band-pass filtering on
each channel.
2. Thresholding and pulse
generation on each channel.
3. Generating a
long-lived decaying signal on one channel.
4. Generating a very
short, unitary sampling pulse on the other channel.
5. Minimum-detection
based sampling on the other channel delievers a signal that decreases
monotonically with time.
The OCTAVE system works mainly on concept of relative motion of an
aerial vehicle with respect to the contrasting terrain underneath. The OCTAVE
robot can lift itself automatically so as to follow a terrain over a wide range
of ground speeds, by essentially relying on the data provided by EMD sensor
that is pointed downwards.
The OSCAR sensor, on the other hand, responds to the
micro-scanning movements of the visual sensor itself. The system based on the
micro-scanning system in the flying fly can be used for detecting and locating
targets to an accuracy of fraction of pixel period.
At Georgia Tech Research Institute[5], research work is being done
on a device called the
‘Entomopter’. The generation of the Entomopter is designed for
operation in two different atmospheres: a 50-gram terrestrial version and an
aerospace version designed for use in different gravitational environments.
Both of them are made from carbon composite materials. The design process is
such that it is a circulation control process that turns high speed, hot-gas
flow into lower speed, cooler gas that can, when vented out through the wing,
cause flow that gives the vehicle seven times more lift and lets it fly at
lower speeds. However, flight control processes will start only after flight mechanics
is solved. This project is being funded by DARPA and NASA too is interested on
deploying such a vehicle for Mars mission.
Though initially it was planned that this micro-sized air vehicle
would go over a hill or find an obstacle and find enemy location, it soon
proved to be impractical for problems related to line-of-sight communication.
So, the group has since shifted focus to indoor operations wherein the devices
are nimble enough to enter a building through a chimney or open window, fly
fast to evade camera detection and carry out surveillance mission[8].
4. BIOMIMETICS ON LAND
Stanford’s Centre for Design
Research[8,3,4], has a team that is designing and fabricating six-legged robots
that try to resemble the physical construction and mechanical design that are
responsible for the robustness of the cockroach. Points that have been
difficult to understand the mechanism of the cockroach are several.
Cutkosky notes that “ They run over obstacles without slowing down
or getting knocked off course, and they do this mainly by virtue of having a
wonderful tuned mechanical system-sort of suspension of car- that keeps then
stable and on course. It’s hard to damage a cockroach.”
The Sprawl robots, which the team is presently designing, are
unique in the sense that they rely on good mechanical design rather than faster
computational properties. The various aspects considered in the design of the
robot are:
1.Self-stabilizing posture.
2. Thrusting and stabilizing leg function.
3. Passive visco-elastic structure.
4. Timed, open-loop/feed forward control.
5. Integrated construction.
The robot is able to move autonomously up to 15 body lengths per
second. The system has six legs that move in alternating –tripod gait in a
sprawled design that mimics the cockroach’s biological structure and allows the
robot to move faster. Shape deposition manufacturing process has been used for
embedding the various sensors, actuators and microprocessors. It is a complex
process that has given rise to a durable polymer shell.
Another robot that is inspired by the
cockroach is the Robot Hexapod Rhex (pronounced as “rex” )[2] is considered to
be the most maneuverable robot built. It’s about the size of a shoebox. It can
bump along at up to 3 meters per second and last close to two hours on one
battery charge. It has
Fig.6 The Whegs, are
being developed at the Case Western Reserve University and are
inspired by a hybrid mechanism of wheels and
legs.
six legs, which are capable of clockwise
rotation. It’s a possible candidate for the 2007 mission to Mars, which needs
surface robots to navigate rough terrain. It uses a total of 6 motors and
spoke-like legs.
The Wheg series of robots beings developed at Case Western Reserve
University[7] use insect behavior study and other biological data. The term
‘whegs’ is derived from the words ‘WHEels’ and ‘leGS’. It utilizes a method of
locomotion that combines the advantages of wheels and legs. Wheels are easier
to use and allow vehicles to move faster over terrain quickly. Legs allow
robots to climb obstacles that are higher than what a wheeled vehicle would be
able to climb over. Whegs use just one motor for propulsion, which gives it the
advantage of being able to supply to any leg with the maximum power available
on board the vehicle. If individual
motors are used to drive each leg, then each must be powerful enough for bad
scenario. Here, same amount of torque can be applied by much less weight of
motor.
IRobot has built an autonomous robot,
Ariel[2], on the concept of crab, which is capable of moving on its own. It is
probably the first legged robot capable of walking either on land or underwater
in the turbulent surf zone. It can climb over obstacles and crevices that would
block traditional wheeled vehicles and can also resist the impact of waves.
Ariel is also completely invertible — if flipped over by the waves, its legs
simply reorient so that the "top" of the body becomes the bottom. It
is undergoing tests in which it locates mines in the surf zone.
Shape Deposition Manufacturing process[3] is a layered prototyping
method where parts or assemblies are built up through a cycle of alternating
layers of structural and support materials. After a layer of material is added,
it is then shaped to a precise contour before the next layer is added. The
intermittent addition of support material allows for the construction of
arbitrary geometries. Unlike many other layered processes, the material is
shaped after it is added. This allows for high precision.
Figure 8 describes the construction of multi-material compliant
leg that was used in the robots. It takes the advantage of SDM’s capability to
vary the material properties during construction of the part. Each layer was
built up on a different material, each with its own characteristics. The
deposition of a layer of viscoelastic polyurethane creates the compliant,
damped hip flexure joint. A stiffer grade of polyurethane had been used for
structural members, which encase the piston and servo mounting.
inside the part in a precise and repeatable fashion was used by
them to create the robot’s body. As shown, the robot’s servos, wiring and
connectors were embedded within the body. They did this by first shaping the
support substrate (high melting-temperature wax) as a mold for the bottom of
the body. The embedded components were then placed and protected by sacrificial
material (low melting-temperature wax). A layer of structural material
(pourable polyurethane) was then deposited and shaped, thereby encasing the
embedded components. Finally, the sacrificial material was removed to access
the finished part.
All in
all, this method of manufacturing process in the field of robotics can
definitely help in improving the precision with which the work is done.
Especially in the case of small robots, it is generally quite difficult to
manage the joints and fixtures and so fasteners are used. However, in such
situations, use of this kind of manufacturing practices can add great value to
the overall time saved.
Fundamentally, a system designed to
assemble can also disassmble itself. However, nature works in a different
pattern and manner. Here actuators, sensors and structural members are
compactly packaged in an integrated fashion and protected from the environment.
In addition, nature’s compliant materials are capable of large strains without
failures. Also, material properties are variable. It is not easy to achieve the
complexity and elegance of biological structures but shape deposition manufacturing technique has enabled them to
build integrated assemblies with embedded components and material variations.
6.STEPS BEFORE MOVING IN TO THE FIELD OF BIOMIMETICS
(1) One should have a basic
understanding into the mechanisms by which lower animals achieve physical
robustness and an ability to accomplish basic tasks such as locomotion despite
large changes in the environment. Studies of animal kinematics, dynamics,
structural elasticity, muscle activation and sensing provide us an insight to
design and control of small robots, sensors and actuators.
(2) Passive mechanical properties that
enable animals to adapt to changes in environment should be employed to the
robots so that they can be utilized in multiple environments and multiple
tasks.
(3) These things should be then
manufactured and tested before moving on to the software development part.
Tests can include locomotion and manipulation of awkward and delicate loads and
application can be to get wreckages from ocean floor or say de mining of
particular area.
(4) New technologies like Shape
deposition manufacturing (SDM) should be tried and used to develop structures
with complex three-dimensional gravity, embedded sensors and actuators. It
should primarily be done to overcome present scenario of using metal
components. Individual parts should be taken into consideration before
proceeding further.
(5) Better actuation and sensing signals are the
key to better biomimetics. Much research is to be done in that field for
improvement of robots.
(6) Automation of these robots is also
another important aspect of this whole process. For that, however, application
field is very important without which it is difficult to get an idea of what to
develop.
APPLICATIONS
Various
exciting applications can be thought of in this field. However, concrete
development at this stage is very less. However, I would like to discuss some
applications.
- The
most exciting applications of all is that of the use of bioinspired robots in
the exploration of Mars. The technology called BEES ( bioinspired engineering
of exploration systems )[11] is being planned to utilize in future missions to
Mars. Here, bioinspired visual navigation sensors are used on small flyers to
enable autonomous flights. The bioinspired sensor suite consists of dragonfly
inspired ocelli for flight stabilization and attitude referencing,
honeybee-inspired optic flow for terrain following, lateral – drift
containment, and localization, and sun and sky polarization based
compassing.The sensors also include a perspective camera and panoramic camera
for autonomous terrain following and hazard avoidance. Important factors to be
considered include processing feature/landmark images and autonomous
recognition strategies, sensing and communication, locomotion, adaptive control
and reconfiguration, deployment, cooperative operations and bioinspired system
design.
-
In
military missions, where humans cannot reach, these robots can reach and do the
work if possible. For example, an unmanned aerial vehicle can be used for
surveying and a lobster robot for checking if there are underwater mines.
-
Further,
surveillance capabilities need to be enhanced. Lobster robots can be sent to
deep heights under the water to find out unexplored waters. At the same time,
it can be used to find wreckages and debris under the water.
CONCLUSION
The
field of biomimetics is at a very nascent stage and is yet to be explored to
its full potential. However, the important thing that we all understand is that
lower level of animals possesses tremendous capacities, which can be slowly
brought into the field of robotics. Its not about recreating a cockroach but to
recognize its good points so that robots are developed accordingly. Inspiration
can be drawn from the fact that some of the top universities of USA – Stanford,
UC Berkeley, Harvard and John Hopkins have joined hands to promote this field
and work further in the area. Also, if we can combine the best of abilities of
all animals on earth the day is not far when we would be able to develop a
single robot capable of running faster than cheetah, stronger than the lion,
faster than swift in flight and agile as eagle would be developed.
REFERENCES
[1] F
Ruffier, S Viollet, N Franceschini, “OSCAR and OCTAVE: Two bio-inspired visually guided
micro-robots,” Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Robotics
2003 pp 726-732
[2]
Erki Suurjaak, “Bioinspired Hardware”
[3] Jonathan E. Clark, Jorge G. Cham,
Sean A. Bailey, Edward M. Froehlich, Pratik K. Nahata, Robert J. Full, Mark R.
Cutkosky, “Biomietic Design and Fabrication of a Hexapedal Running Robot”, 2001
IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
[4]
Robert Full, Timothy Kubow, John Schmitt, Philips Holmes, Daniel Koditschek,
“Quantifying Dynamic Stability and Maneuverability in Legged Locomotion”,
Integ. And Comp. Biology.42:149-157 (2002).
[5]
Robert Michelson, “Entomopter Project”
[6]Ayers., J., Zavracky, P., McGruer, N., Massa, D., Vorus, V.,
Mukherjee, R., Currie, S. (1998) “A Modular Behavioral-Based Architecture for
Biomimetic Autonomous Underwater Robots”.
[7] Biologically Inspired Robotics
Laboratory, Case Reserve Western University.
[8] Linda Dailey Paulson, “Biomimetic
Robots”, September 2004, Computer Magazine.
[9] “Biomimetic Underwater Robot Program”, Marine Science Centre, North
eastern University.
[10]
Stanford Centre for Design Research, “Sprawl Robots,” www.cdr.stanford.edu/biomi
[11]
Sarita Thakoor, John Michael Morokiaan, Javaan Chahl, Butler Hine, Steve
Hornetzer, “ BEES: Exploring Mars with Bioinspired Technologies”, September
2004, Computer Magazine.
No comments:
Post a Comment